Werbung
Werbung

VM Visit to Utrecht: Traffic Shift with a Clear Focus on Bicycles

The Dutch city has about 360,000 inhabitants – and seemingly at least as many bicycles. Utrecht spends over 130 euros per inhabitant per year on creating a bicycle-friendly infrastructure. For the German visitor, the rush hour presents a rather unusual picture ...

Rush hour in Utrecht - almost only cyclists, a few city buses, and very few private cars. | Photo: T. Kanzler
Rush hour in Utrecht - almost only cyclists, a few city buses, and very few private cars. | Photo: T. Kanzler
Werbung
Werbung
Thomas Kanzler

The old parts of Utrecht with their narrow streets are barely suitable for car traffic anyway. But even the area around the modern main railway station with some skyscrapers is almost car-free. There are wide cycle paths - and streets that are almost exclusively used by city buses.

Safety for Cyclists Already in Traffic Planning

Many planning measures to increase safety for cyclists have not proven effective in practice. Instead of protected cycle paths and fewer areas for car traffic, German authorities have primarily relied on marking solutions in the past. Thus, cycle lanes often end abruptly, lead over traffic islands or intersections, and are often unclear. This hardly creates incentives to leave the car and take the bicycle. The number of fatal bicycle accidents is higher in Germany than in the Netherlands or Denmark. Only a few cities like Freiburg, Münster, or Göttingen have very good infrastructure.

Not only the actual accident frequency is relevant. Near collisions, so-called "Near Misses", are much more common than actual accidents. These significantly influence individual feelings of safety. The accident research of German insurers also confirms that this sense of insecurity is justified in a study published in 2019: Interviews and measurements in 13 German cities painted a bleak picture. Numerous motor vehicles ignore bike lanes, overtake too closely, or block the paths by illegal parking.

Rethinking in the Netherlands already in the 80s

Industrialization and rising prosperity in the 1960s and 70s also led to an increase in car ownership in the Netherlands. With the growing individual traffic, the number of traffic fatalities rose dramatically. In 1971, 3,300 people died on Dutch roads, including 400 children. In 2017, there were only 613 deaths on Dutch roads (3.6 traffic fatalities per 100,000 inhabitants – for comparison: Germany: 3.8 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants, a total of 3,180 deaths). The high number of children killed at that time triggered massive waves of protests. Under the motto “Stop the Child Murder,” the demonstrators called for a traffic change. The oil crisis led to a rethinking of previously car-centered Dutch policies. A bicycle-friendly course and car-free Sundays marked the beginning, with many cities subsequently banning cars from city centers and investing in bicycle paths. Safety increased – and with it the number of cyclists.

Consistent Separation of Car Traffic

Only a consistent separation from car traffic can help. This is the only way to reduce dangers from parked cars or opening car doors. Staggered green phases, where cyclists get green lights earlier than cars, can help as much as redesigned intersections. This way, right-turning drivers can better see cyclists who would otherwise be in their blind spot. Amsterdam and Copenhagen are considered pioneers in bicycle safety. Although cyclists account for about one-third to 45 percent of road users, the number of accidents is approximately 90 percent lower than in Germany.

You need a lot of money - and space

To create a bicycle-friendly infrastructure, two factors are particularly crucial: money and space. In both cases, there are competing interests. More areas for bicycle traffic—especially at intersections and bike paths—mean drawbacks for other road users. The minimal and compromise solutions common in many German cities do not reliably increase safety. A bicycle-friendly infrastructure costs significantly more money than German administrations have been spending so far. According to a Greenpeace study, major German cities spent an average of between €2.30 (Munich), €2.90 (Hamburg), €4.70 (Berlin), and €5 (Stuttgart) per capita per year on bicycle traffic over the past four to six years. Amsterdam (€11) and Copenhagen (€35.60), on the other hand, invest significantly more in bicycle traffic. Oslo (€70) and especially Utrecht (€132) are far ahead.

What does that mean?

Utrecht has largely freed the streets around the center from car traffic. Articulated buses—many already electric—and above all cyclists are on the streets. Some things may not be replicable one-to-one in other cities. The consistent path of the bicycle-loving Dutch may seem a bit strange in car-loving Germany, but our editor has never experienced such a relaxed rush hour as in Utrecht.

Translated automatically from German.
Werbung

Branchenguide

Werbung