VM Survey: Should large and heavy cars be subject to a "luxury tax"?

In France, the CO2-priced tax can now amount to up to 50,000 euros if one chooses a gas-guzzler. In Denmark, a car is still considered a luxury and is inherently extremely expensive, and in the meantime, Germany also considered introducing a kind of "luxury tax" for large and/or heavy cars.

That the topic is polarizing is shown by 120 votes and your opinion was clear: The majority, i.e., 59% (71 votes) voted for: "Absolutely, the SUV trend counteracts climate goals for both internal combustion and electric cars."

The proposal that received the fewest votes was: "Maybe, but one should absolutely exempt electric SUVs." This option was supported by 15% or 18 voters. On the other hand, 26% or 31 votes were for "No way! Everyone should drive what they want - people just like SUVs."

Which makes it clear: A majority of voters have no problem with a kind of "luxury tax" for large and heavy vehicles, especially since there is often more financial leeway here. Or, freedom of choice - no one should be penalized for their vehicle choice. Only a few could warm up to a differentiation that exempts electric SUVs.